Lessons from an Accident – Put Chemistry back into Chemical Engineering
On December 19, 2007 a reactor exploded in the plant of T2 Laboratories at Jacksonville, Florida. 4 people lost their lives and 14 were hospitalized. More than 100 firefighters battled what many eyewitnesses described as a ‘hellish inferno’. Pieces of the plant were found 400 m away from the blast site. The plant was manufacturing MCMT, a gasoline additive.
So why should this accident make news again 21 months after its occurrence? The US Chemical Safety Board (CSB) which went into the reasons of the accident has published its final draft report. The report says that the accident occurred because of a runaway chemical reaction due to inadequate reactor cooling system. But that is merely stating a matter of fact. What makes the report so extraordinary is its finding that the 2 owners of the company were unaware of the potential or consequences of a runaway chemical reaction, despite their undergraduate degrees in chemistry and chemical engineering. The report minces no words to make the startling observation that most baccalaureate chemical engineering curricula in the U.S. do not specifically address reactive hazard recognition or management. It is a most harsh indictment of the state of chemical engineering education in USA. If things are this bad in the country which taught chemical engineering to rest of the world, I shudder to reflect upon the situation prevailing in Indian Universities.
CSB’s report calls for improving the education of chemical engineering students on reactive chemical hazards and asks the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) to work together to include reactive chemical education in baccalaureate chemical engineering curricula across the country. Our universities need to follow suit without any further ado. It is time to put chemistry back into chemical engineering.
So why should this accident make news again 21 months after its occurrence? The US Chemical Safety Board (CSB) which went into the reasons of the accident has published its final draft report. The report says that the accident occurred because of a runaway chemical reaction due to inadequate reactor cooling system. But that is merely stating a matter of fact. What makes the report so extraordinary is its finding that the 2 owners of the company were unaware of the potential or consequences of a runaway chemical reaction, despite their undergraduate degrees in chemistry and chemical engineering. The report minces no words to make the startling observation that most baccalaureate chemical engineering curricula in the U.S. do not specifically address reactive hazard recognition or management. It is a most harsh indictment of the state of chemical engineering education in USA. If things are this bad in the country which taught chemical engineering to rest of the world, I shudder to reflect upon the situation prevailing in Indian Universities.
CSB’s report calls for improving the education of chemical engineering students on reactive chemical hazards and asks the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) to work together to include reactive chemical education in baccalaureate chemical engineering curricula across the country. Our universities need to follow suit without any further ado. It is time to put chemistry back into chemical engineering.
7 Comments:
Excellent observation.
Thanks for the helpful information. Hope to hear more from you.
Atleast in Mumbai University curriculum, Industrial Safety is included as a separate subject in the final year of Chemical Engineering which stressed on important techniques like HAZOP.
In most cases, the cause is lack of hazard identification and presence of reliable risk mitigation system. Taking few hours of university classes can help create awareness, but every operating facility has to have a comprehensive risk management program.
Dr. Saraf
http://risk-safety.com
Dr. Saraf / Ms. Shruti
My point is about fully understanding the chemistry of every reaction and identifying the potential for a runaway reaction, if any. This needs to be addressed in a undergraduate Chemical Reaction Engineering course. This is the essence of the CSB recommendation.
Dear Mr. Sahasranaman
I realize the importance of chemistry education particularly in understanding unwanted hazardous reactions. However, in most cases this is very resource intensive and therefore not practical. You can read about my suggested approach to screening reactive hazards on my blog.
Regards
Sanjeev
I would like to invite you to write a short opinion piece for the website www.BiotechAndEngineering.com
I follow your work and think that you could share your opinion with a larger public. I believe in the promotion and dissemination of knowledge through the Internet as a way to improve our academic capabilities.
I only ask for a short essay about any matter you consider important. To get a better idea what I am looking for please see www.BiotechAndEngineering.com and go to Open Space Articles
In return is offered promotion to your name and work.
For more informations, please contact me biotechandengineering@gmail.com
Post a Comment
<< Home